| September 8, 2006
Mr. Robert E. Feldman
Executive Secretary
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
550 17th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20429
Re: Deposit Insurance Assessments – Designated Reserve Ratio
RIN 3064-AD02
71 FR 41973 (July 24, 2006)
Dear Mr. Feldman:
America’s Community Bankers (ACB) is pleased to comment on the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation’s (FDIC) proposal concerning the designated reserve ratio
for all insured depository institutions. This is one of several proposals
recently issued by the FDIC to implement the Deposit Insurance Reform Act of
2005 (Reform Act). Under the Reform Act, the FDIC must by regulation set the
Designated Reserve Ratio (DRR) for the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) annually
within a range of 1.15 percent to 1.50 percent of estimated insured deposits. In
setting the DRR for any year, the FDIC must consider the risk of losses to the
DIF in the current and future years, economic conditions generally affecting
insured depository institutions, prevention of sharp swings in assessment rates
for insured depository institutions and other factors the FDIC deems
appropriate. Any change to the DRR in the future must be made through regulation
after notice and opportunity for comment. The FDIC is proposing to initially set
the DRR at 1.25 percent.
ACB believes that the FDIC should draw upon the maximum level of flexibility
provided under the Reform Act to assess premiums in an even and balanced way and
to build up the DIF across an appropriate period of time in order to allow
institutions enough time to prepare for this new, significant expenditure. ACB
encourages the FDIC to remain flexible while keeping the reserve ratio within
the allowable range of 1.15 and 1.50. The Reform Act grants the FDIC the
authority to manage within this range as a way of maintaining stability within
the banking industry. Volatility in any form is undesirable for all insured
depository institutions, and ACB strongly urges the FDIC to initially move
towards their targeted DRR at a slow and steady pace as well as maintain such an
approach in the future should the reserve ratio fall below the targeted DRR.
It is understandable that the FDIC would desire to build up the reserve ratio to
its target as soon as possible. However, ACB believes that it would better serve
the banking industry as a whole to slowly build up the reserve ratio in an
effort to ease the transition burden and associated shock to the overall banking
system. We urge the FDIC to provide for a smoother transition by initially
building up the reserve ratio over a three-year period, at a minimum.
Finally, we request that the FDIC provide further analysis on setting the DRR at
1.25%. ACB understands that it would not be prudent to set the target at the
minimum of the range outlined in the Reform Act (i.e., 1.15%), however, the
rationale for the 1.25% target is unclear. We believe it would be worthwhile to
publish, in the final rule, a more in-depth explanation of the FDIC’s position.
ACB appreciates the opportunity to comment on this important issue. If you have
any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (202)
857-3121 or via email at
[email protected] or Jodie Goff at (202) 857-3158 or via email at
[email protected].
Sincerely,
Patricia A. Milon
Chief Legal Officer and Senior Vice President,
Regulatory Affairs
|